Sunday, January 25, 2015

Lightsabers: The Toy we Dream About


 
The lightsaber was nothing more than a fictional idea that came about because of the fictional movie series Star Wars. For someone who doesn’t know what a lightsaber is then look at the urban dictionary definition to get an accurate description. With the release of the second Star Wars trilogy, lightsaber toys became the new hit. They could be found in any store such as Walmart, Target, or Toys R Us. Some companies, such as ultrasabers, have taken the lightsaber fad even farther and made web sites where a customer can customize their own lightsaber. Luckily for Star Wars fanatics, the toy aisle is not the end of the road for lightsabers. Scientists and MIT and Harvard have accidently created a “lightsaber”. Unfortunately this does not mean a real lightsaber will be the toy of the future.
 
Lightsabers as a sellable toy won’t become a hit across the United States because of how much a lightsaber would cost consumers. The most developed lightsaber currently on the market costs around $400. The problem is that this lightsaber is still just a more advanced version of something you could buy in Walmart. It has a polycarbonate tube that attaches to a spyder 3 laser. This is more advanced because the Walmart lightsaber is nothing more than colored plastic put together around a flashlight. The Wicked Lasers design is much more high tech because it uses similar technology to that of a laser light show. Now just imagine if scientists successfully took lightsabers to the next step. This means removing the plastic or polycarbonate tube and just having a beam of light that extended a few feet from a metal tube. Buying a real life lightsaber would cost well over a few thousand dollars because of the amount of technology that is needed to cause photons to flow a few feet and then bounce back without scattering across the whole room. The presumed cost to purchase a lightsaber is one thing that will keep it from becoming a common household item. Another factor is that the research and knowledge on how to construct an actual lightsaber are still in the baby stages.
 
 
Not much money has been put into research because most people just don't think an actual lightsaber can exist. Scientists also have more important projects to deal with. People don't think an actual lightsaber is possible because light particles, or photons, when emitted scatter throughout a room as opposed to stopping after a few feet like in a lightsaber from Star Wars. Another problem with creating a lightsaber is that photons aren’t solid so they will pass right through each other. This is different from the Star Wars movies, because in those, the lightsabers would clash like real swords. Scientists have reportedly discovered the first step to making real life lightsaber. They did this by cooling atoms with laser beams. This in turn slowed the atoms own enough to where they could form a solid like piece of matter. The thing is though that the results were accidental and they don’t plan on doing further research into developing a lightsaber. Instead they will use the information to help understand different scientific projects like quantum computing. It is clear that the technology to create a lightsaber does not exist yet and most likely never will because not enough people are willing to fund its research. But lets pretend everyone wants a real lightsaber and everyone will do whatever it takes to get one.
We will pretend everyone wants a lightsaber right now and scientists are willing to work in a lab until lightsabers are on every shelf in every store. We will look at a theoretical design for a lightsaber as well as some practical uses. The first thing we need to do is learn how to turn light into a solid material and this,as stated above, has already been accomplished by researchers at MIT and Harvard. So we will use their method and shoot lasers at photons and slow them down. Another thing that needs to be done is finding a way to keep the photons from extending throughout the room. This could be accomplished by attaching a small mirror at the end of the lightsaber. This will force the photons back to the source of light instead of turning into a laser pointer or a flashlight. So what are some practical uses for a lightsaber? First, a lightsaber would just be awesome to have lying around a house as a decoration. Now for some more useful suggestions. The most likely use for a lightsaber would be as a weapon in the military or for law enforcement. They could also be weapons for self-defense in place of a concealed firearm. It would work well because it would have the power to block bullets as well and cut through anything like in the Star Wars movies. Another option would be for surgery. The lightsaber could be made into a smaller less powerful model and be used instead of scalpels. This would benefit doctors because they wouldn’t have to worry about sanitizing their scalpels and other cutting equipment. The final use for a lightsaber would be as a construction tool. Companies could use a lightsaber instead of saws to cut wood, metal, or plastic. In theory, a lightsaber would be fun but it is also dangerous and could cause many deaths and injuries.
Back to reality, a lightsaber would be fun to have and has many everyday practical uses but lets be honest, we may never have the proper technology to make them and even if we did, the odds are people wouldn't want to spend hundreds or thousands of dollars on a lightsaber. To create a lightsaber, scientists would have to figure out how to turn photons into solid particles that would act as a blade of light. Another thing is that lightsabers would be very dangerous and could be deadly if given to criminals. Lightsabers may be cool in theory but unfortunately they will never be more than a movie gimmick.

Thursday, January 15, 2015

TV Affects Us More than We Know


Television has changed immensely over the last 50 years. Initially televisions had limited color and limited channels and now they have 3D channels, HD channels, and unlimited potential. These changes have had positive effects on society which were accurately predicted by Marshall McLuhan in his novel Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. With television we are able to learn about current events more quickly and more in depth and with many new shows we feel connected to the television.

McLuhan guessed correctly that we would become more connected to our televisions as time went on and he expressed this on page 31. He stated that television helped in "transforming fragmented and specialist extensions into a seamless web of experience". I would say McLuhan was dead on in this prediction because the shows on television nowadays have become part of our lives. Examples of this is turning on the television at eight pm every Tuesday to watch the new episode of Modern Family. Aliye says that television has disconnected us but I disagree because many families plan their day around a specific show and make sure that all their chores are done before it comes on. In a sense, television shows hook us and control our lives until the season is over. Anderson Proctor talks about how televisions are seen in every house and has a funny meme to go along with it.

McLuhan talks about how we can become connected to television but later in the writing he talks about how television can also connect us to other viewers. Marshall states that "the Kennedy funeral, in short, manifested the power of TV to involve an entire population in a ritual process" pg 34. While he couldn't predict future national disasters he did say that they would connect the citizens because they would all have their eyes glued to the television. I agree with this point because large news stories give Americans a sense of patriotism because everyone supports those who are injured in the case of a disaster and many people come together to help their communities. One more recent example is hurricane Katrina (video may play). Mostly everyone knows the story and how people all across the country donated money to help those affected by the hurricane. This is a great example of how television has change over the years. Darine's blog post helps explain why people are able to connect more easily through new stories and that's because almost every household owns a television and everyone is getting the same news.

I agree with McLuhan's arguments that television would change over the years and become a part of us and connect to our daily lives as well as connect us to other viewers. First it would become part of us because we would, over time, make time in our days to sit down and watch television. Television has also transformed into a common median between citizens during large news stories because interesting news stories are all people talk about.   

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

What's so Great About 3D TV's?





A new experience that has popped up in the last decade or so is the 3D experience. This new invention started in amusement parks such as Universal Studios and then from there to movie theaters across the country. Now the trend 3D has started to make its way into our family rooms. Unfortunately, 3D televisions have entered our family rooms too early and television companies have not had the proper time to perfect the 3D technology.

Buy a 3D Television...


positive of a 3D television is that watching experience is much better compared to watching a television on a 2D television. A 3D television gives the viewer a feeling that they are in the middle of the action because movie characters or athletes are popping out of the screen at them and seemingly moving around in the family room. Another benefit is that a lot of work is put in to make the resolution of 3D televisions higher quality than your average 2D television. The problem is that these some major improvements need to be made before 3D televisions can be found in every household.

But Wait a Few More Years


The first improvement that needs to be made deals with 3D glasses. The current glasses that come with 3D televisions are bulky and not comfortable to wear. It is possible to have 3D technology on a screen without glasses and this is evident in a Nintendo 3DS. The problem is that they haven't developed the technology to translate the small 3D screen in a DS to a larger screen such as a 60" television. Another problem is that television channels have not caught up yet in the 3D technology and many channels don't offer shows in 3D. This is a problem because viewers would have to switch from 2D mode to 3D mode regularly if they wanted to watch different channels in the same sitting.

3D televisions are an exciting piece of technology because they offer a new at-home experience and the feeling that the viewer is actually a part of the television. The problem is that were released too early. Companies should have waiting until 3D technology was more advanced and didn't need glasses. They should also waited until more channels had a 3D option.